SEC
Economic Unreality: What SEC ICO Precedents Mean for Ripple
The history and future of crypto securities law told in four acts: Kik, Telegram, Library and Ripple.

Irrealidade econômica: o que os precedentes da SEC ICO significam para o Ripple
A história e o futuro da lei de Cripto contada em quatro atos: Kik, Telegram, Library e Ripple.

Irréalité économique : ce que les précédents de la SEC ICO signifient pour Ripple
L'histoire et l'avenir du droit des titres Crypto racontés en quatre actes : Kik, Telegram, Library et Ripple.

Экономическая нереальность: что означают прецеденты SEC ICO для Ripple
История и будущее закона о Криптo ценных бумагах изложены в четырех законах: Kik, Telegram, Library и Ripple.

Економічна нереальність: що прецеденти SEC ICO означають для Ripple
Історія та майбутнє закону про Крипто цінні папери розповідається в чотирьох діях: Kik, Telegram, Library і Ripple.

Irrealtà economica: cosa significano i precedenti della SEC ICO per Ripple
La storia e il futuro del diritto dei Cripto security raccontati in quattro atti: Kik, Telegram, Library e Ripple.

The ‘Good Cop and Bad Cop’ of US Crypto Regulations
The ongoing tug-of-war between the top two federal regulatory agencies keeps the crypto industry on its toes. That’s why Gary Gensler and Rostin Behnam share a spot on CoinDesk’s Most Influential 2022.

Crypto Regulation Progress Is at ‘Brick Wall Stage’: Law Professor
Penn State Dickinson Law Professor Tonya Evans discusses the current state of the turf war between SEC and CFTC for jurisdiction over crypto activities. "I think we're at the brick wall stage, and it's forcing the hand of legislators to amend legislation," Evans said.

Crypto Is at ‘Brick Wall Stage' and Needs ‘Right Balance’ of Regulation, Says Legal Expert
Pennsylvania State University Dickinson Law Professor Tonya Evans discusses why the ecosystem is in need of thoughtful regulation from lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

SEC Could Use BlockFi as Object Lesson for Clear Crypto Regulation, Says Ex-SEC Official
Howard Fischer discusses why the SEC is more concerned with setting standards than getting the $30 million owed by the failed lender.
