Share this article
BTC
$110,041.10
+
1.67%ETH
$2,594.14
+
1.99%USDT
$1.0002
+
0.02%XRP
$2.4116
+
0.61%BNB
$678.01
+
1.80%SOL
$175.22
+
1.85%USDC
$0.9998
+
0.02%DOGE
$0.2402
+
2.92%ADA
$0.7772
+
3.65%TRX
$0.2697
-
0.82%SUI
$3.9688
+
1.64%LINK
$16.22
+
1.79%AVAX
$23.47
+
3.28%XLM
$0.2958
+
2.71%HYPE
$28.92
+
2.52%SHIB
$0.0₄1506
+
2.26%HBAR
$0.1991
+
1.29%LEO
$8.8380
+
0.92%BCH
$414.51
+
2.85%TON
$3.1176
+
0.18%Sign Up
- Back to menuPrices
- Back to menuResearch
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menuWebinars & Events
E-Gold Claims US Officials Buried Key Report in 2008 Landmark Crypto Ruling
A court filing alleges federal government suppression of an OFR review led to crypto businesses being defined as money transmitters.

A defunct digital currency project that was a precursor to bitcoin has claimed the U.S. government suppressed crucial evidence in a 2008 landmark case that has since shaped the cryptocurrency industry.
- E-Gold's former directors filed a petition Tuesday for a writ of coram nobis – in which the court changes the original judgment upon discovery of a fundamental error – at the District of Columbia court.
- Founded in 1996, E-Gold allowed users to trade digital units backed by precious metals. At its peak, the company held around $85 million in gold.
- The U.S. government charged E-Gold with being an unlicensed money transmitter in 2007 and the project's directors pleaded guilty in 2008.
- The ex-directors now claim in court the federal government unlawfully concealed a 2006 review from Florida's Office for Financial Regulation (OFR) so it "could make an example" of E-Gold.
- Per the filing, the OFR review said E-Gold did not count as a money transmitter because the gold-based asset was closer to a commodity than a fiat currency under state law.
- E-Gold's former directors claim the court's judgment would have been substantially different had they been allowed access to the OFR review
- The E-Gold case effectively extended the definition of "money transmitter" in the U.S. to include any system that stored and transferred value.
- Many crypto businesses subsequently have had to be regulated as money transmitters in individual states if they want to operate legally in the U.S.
See the full filing below:
See also: Lessons From the First Digital Gold Boom
Paddy Baker
Paddy Baker is a London-based cryptocurrency reporter. He was previously senior journalist at Crypto Briefing.
Paddy holds positions in BTC and ETH, as well as smaller amounts of LTC, ZIL, NEO, BNB and BSV.
