Share this article
BTC
$93,312.88
+
0.61%ETH
$1,759.32
-
0.65%USDT
$1.0003
+
0.01%XRP
$2.1817
-
0.28%BNB
$601.06
-
0.46%SOL
$151.54
+
2.24%USDC
$0.9999
+
0.01%DOGE
$0.1803
+
4.05%ADA
$0.7098
+
4.18%TRX
$0.2439
+
0.32%SUI
$3.3334
+
11.78%LINK
$14.95
+
3.13%AVAX
$22.06
+
0.42%LEO
$9.2246
+
0.38%XLM
$0.2750
+
4.71%SHIB
$0.0₄1393
+
5.08%TON
$3.2037
+
2.40%HBAR
$0.1859
+
4.68%BCH
$355.17
-
2.35%LTC
$83.71
+
1.49%Sign Up
- Back to menuPrices
- Back to menuResearch
- Back to menuConsensus
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menuWebinars & Events
E-Gold Claims US Officials Buried Key Report in 2008 Landmark Crypto Ruling
A court filing alleges federal government suppression of an OFR review led to crypto businesses being defined as money transmitters.

A defunct digital currency project that was a precursor to bitcoin has claimed the U.S. government suppressed crucial evidence in a 2008 landmark case that has since shaped the cryptocurrency industry.
- E-Gold's former directors filed a petition Tuesday for a writ of coram nobis – in which the court changes the original judgment upon discovery of a fundamental error – at the District of Columbia court.
- Founded in 1996, E-Gold allowed users to trade digital units backed by precious metals. At its peak, the company held around $85 million in gold.
- The U.S. government charged E-Gold with being an unlicensed money transmitter in 2007 and the project's directors pleaded guilty in 2008.
- The ex-directors now claim in court the federal government unlawfully concealed a 2006 review from Florida's Office for Financial Regulation (OFR) so it "could make an example" of E-Gold.
- Per the filing, the OFR review said E-Gold did not count as a money transmitter because the gold-based asset was closer to a commodity than a fiat currency under state law.
- E-Gold's former directors claim the court's judgment would have been substantially different had they been allowed access to the OFR review
- The E-Gold case effectively extended the definition of "money transmitter" in the U.S. to include any system that stored and transferred value.
- Many crypto businesses subsequently have had to be regulated as money transmitters in individual states if they want to operate legally in the U.S.
See the full filing below:
See also: Lessons From the First Digital Gold Boom
Paddy Baker
Paddy Baker is a London-based cryptocurrency reporter. He was previously senior journalist at Crypto Briefing. Paddy holds positions in BTC and ETH, as well as smaller amounts of LTC, ZIL, NEO, BNB and BSV.
