Share this article

Ripple's Chris Larsen Files Motion to Dismiss SEC Case Over XRP Sales

Larsen's lawyers say the SEC has failed to show he knowingly committed any wrongdoing.

Updated Sep 14, 2021, 12:21 p.m. Published Mar 4, 2021, 9:28 a.m.
Ripple Executive Chairman Chris Larsen
Ripple Executive Chairman Chris Larsen

Ripple's executive chairman has asked a U.S. court to dismiss a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit alleging securities violations relating to sales of the XRP cryptocurrency.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
다른 이야기를 놓치지 마세요.오늘 State of Crypto 뉴스레터를 구독하세요. 모든 뉴스레터 보기

According to a legal letter informing Judge Analisa Torres at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York of a motion to dismiss, lawyers say the SEC's amended complaint "still fails to state a claim against Mr. Larsen."

In December, the SEC sued Ripple, CEO Brad Garlinghouse and Larsen alleging they had not registered XRP as a security or sought an exemption, and had sold over $1.3 billion in the cryptocurrency to retail investors.

The central claim centers on Larsen having "knowingly or recklessly provided substantial assistance to another person in violation of [Section 5]” of the Securities Act 1933, according to the amended complaint filed last month.

광고

See also: Ripple, SEC Say Settlement Unlikely Before Trial Over Alleged Securities Violations

On those grounds, Larsen's lawyers contend the SEC failed to show that Larsen knew at the time XRP units were securities and Ripple's activities were inappropriate. They make various points to back this up, including that the Justice Department and FinCEN considered and regulated XRP as a "virtual currency" – a fact inconsistent with it being a security.

"The SEC’s own allegations are not only deficient but affirmatively show it cannot meet this standard," the letter reads. "At a minimum, the SEC must allege that it was 'so obvious' that XRP transactions were securities and Ripple’s conduct was improper that Mr. Larsen 'must have been aware of it.'"

The lawyers also argue the regulator fails to demonstrate Larsen had provided "substantial assistance" to Ripple in carrying out its sales of XRP, or that Larsen's XRP transactions were within the U.S. and hence within its jurisdiction.

"This deficiency is fatal to the Section 5 claim against Mr. Larsen," according to the letter. "To plead a Section 5 violation, the SEC must adequately allege that each sale occurred within the territorial reach of Section 5."

See also: MoneyGram Faces Lawsuit for Allegedly Misleading Investors About XRP

The letter also alleges the SEC's claim for monetary relief is time-barred, having gone beyond the allotted period to pursue a claim under Section 5.

"Because the SEC has alleged that the sales of XRP over a multi-year period constituted only one offer ... the statute of limitations began to run in 2013 and expired in 2018," the letter reads.

More For You

Fintech and Crypto Firms Seek Bank Charters Under Trump Administration: Reuters

Goldman sees only two Fed rate cuts in 2025, BOfA sees extended Fed pause. (JamesQube/Pixabay)

Financial technology and crypto firms are increasingly applying for state or national bank charters, despite the community’s historical resistance to centralized banking.

알아야 할 것:

  • Fintech and crypto firms are increasingly applying for bank charters, anticipating a more favorable regulatory landscape.
  • Becoming a bank allows firms to accept deposits and lower borrowing costs but brings stricter oversight.
  • Regulatory bodies have historically approved few new bank charters, though recent signals suggest a more streamlined process.