Daniel Kuhn

Daniel Kuhn was a deputy managing editor for Consensus Magazine, where he helped produce monthly editorial packages and the opinion section. He also wrote a daily news rundown and a twice-weekly column for The Node newsletter. He first appeared in print in Financial Planning, a trade publication magazine. Before journalism, he studied philosophy as an undergrad, English literature in graduate school and business and economic reporting at an NYU professional program. You can connect with him on Twitter and Telegram @danielgkuhn or find him on Urbit as ~dorrys-lonreb.

Daniel Kuhn

Latest from Daniel Kuhn


Opinion

Perché le reti Cripto dovrebbero preservare la propaganda russa

Internet è il luogo della guerra dell’informazione. I giganti dei social Twitter e Facebook potrebbero eliminare la disinformazione russa, ma vi sono forti ragioni per cui le “fake news” dovrebbero essere preservate.

(Shutterstock)

Opinion

Bakit Dapat Panatilihin ng Crypto Networks ang Russian Propaganda

Ang internet ang lugar ng information war. Maaaring tanggalin ng mga social giant na Twitter at Facebook ang maling impormasyon sa Russia, ngunit mayroong isang malakas na kaso na dapat pangalagaan ang "pekeng balita".

(Shutterstock)

Opinion

Why Crypto Networks Should Preserve Russian Propaganda

The internet is the information war’s venue. Social giants Twitter and Facebook may delete Russian misinformation, but there’s a strong case that “fake news” should be preserved.

(Shutterstock)

Opinion

Por que as redes Cripto deveriam preservar a propaganda russa

A internet é o palco da guerra de informação. Os gigantes sociais Twitter e Facebook podem eliminar a desinformação russa, mas há fortes argumentos de que as “notícias falsas” devem ser preservadas.

(Shutterstock)

Opinion

Pourquoi les réseaux Crypto devraient préserver la propagande russe

Internet est le lieu de la guerre de l’information. Les géants sociaux Twitter et Facebook peuvent supprimer la désinformation russe, mais il existe de solides arguments en faveur de la préservation des « fausses nouvelles ».

(Shutterstock)

Opinion

E se parte del codice di Bitcoin fosse finanziato dallo Stato?

Adam Tooze ha chiesto se la politica Bitcoin sia autoillusa. I cypherpunk sono semplicemente pieni di risorse.

(Michael Dziedzic/Unsplash)

Opinion

То що, якщо частина коду біткойна була профінансована державою?

Адам Туз запитав, чи політика Bitcoin є самообманом. Шифропанки просто винахідливі.

(Michael Dziedzic/Unsplash)

Opinion

So What If Part of Bitcoin's Code Was State-Funded?

Adam Tooze asked if bitcoin politics is self-deluded. Cypherpunks are just resourceful.

(Michael Dziedzic/Unsplash)

Opinion

E daí se parte do código do Bitcoin fosse financiado pelo Estado?

Adam Tooze perguntou se a política do Bitcoin é auto-iludida. Cypherpunks são simplesmente engenhosos.

(Michael Dziedzic/Unsplash)

Opinion

Et si une partie du code de Bitcoin était financée par l'État ?

Adam Tooze a demandé si la politique du Bitcoin était une illusion. Les Cypherpunks sont tout simplement ingénieux.

(Michael Dziedzic/Unsplash)