Share this article

Crypto Companies May Lose Access to 'Service Provider' Domain Names

Amid a surge in applications, a DNS registrar may ban crypto firms from using .bank and .insurance domain names.

Updated Sep 14, 2021, 1:51 p.m. Published Aug 5, 2019, 5:00 a.m.
domain names

Crypto companies may be banned from hosting .bank and .insurance domain extensions.

fTLD Registry Services, a domain name system (DNS) registry, announced it is looking to restrict the DNS extensions from generic banking “service providers.” The proposal comes amid an alleged uptick in applications for .bank domain names by crypto firms.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

Originally, the .bank domain was reserved for government-regulated retail banks, savings associations, national banks, or bank holding companies.

However, according to fTLD director of compliance and policy, Heather Diaz, told Mashable:

“More recently, as the financial services arena has evolved, particularly as it relates to fintechs offering financial products/services (e.g., P2P payment providers, cryptocurrency companies), we have found that some prospective Registrants were seeking domains to enhance their legitimacy to market to regulated entities and/or consumers."
Advertisement

By reinstating the old restrictions, fLTD is trying to “further secure these trusted spaces,” she said. Oddly, Diaz also said the registry has never accepted a crypto company’s application for a .bank domain name.

The name costs approximately $1,000 to host per year.

Included in this potential freeze are P2P payment providers, money transfer businesses, and microloan providers. The company hasn’t formally enacted the restrictions, and has opened the decision to public comment until August 24.

In July, competing registrar EnCirca, launched an ethereum naming service (ENS) to provide domain names at .eth locations. EnCirca currently hosts 61 percent of the .bank domain names registered, according to fTLD data.

Domain names via Shutterstock

More For You

Solana CME Futures Fell Short of BTC and ETH Debuts, but There's a Catch

Solana CME futures first-day activity compared to BTC and ETH debuts. (CME/K33 Research)

When adjusted for asset market capitalization SOL's relative futures volume looks better, K33 Research noted.

What to know:

  • Solana's SOL futures began trading on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) on Monday, with a notional daily volume of $12.3 million and $7.8 million in open interest, significantly lower than the debuts of bitcoin (BTC) and ether (ETH) futures.
  • Despite the seemingly lackluster debut, when adjusted to market value, SOL's first-day figures are more in line with BTC's and ETH's, according to K33 Research.
  • Despite the bearish market conditions, the launch of CME SOL futures offers new ways for institutions to manage their exposure to the token, said Joshua Lim of FalconX.