Share this article

Ether a Security? That Could Have Huge Ramifications for Crypto, Legal Expert Says

The outcome of the New York Attorney General's lawsuit against KuCoin could prompt federal regulatory action against the second-largest crypto asset, says Penn State University Dickinson Law professor Tonya Evans.

Updated Mar 10, 2023, 10:25 p.m. Published Mar 10, 2023, 10:07 p.m.
jwp-player-placeholder

If ether (ETH) is deemed a security by a state court it could prompt federal regulators to act against a major crypto asset, said Tonya Evans, a professor at Penn State University Dickinson Law.

On Thursday, New York State Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against KuCoin for allegedly violating securities laws in the state by offering tokens – including ether – that meet the definition of a security without registering with the Attorney General’s office.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Не пропустіть жодної історії.Підпишіться на розсилку State of Crypto вже сьогодні. Переглянути всі розсилки

One of those tokens listed in the lawsuit is the Ethereum blockchain's ether, the second-largest cryptocurrency by market cap. Seychelles-based KuCoin is the fourth-largest crypto exchange in the world, according to CoinMarketCap data.

Evans said on CoinDesk TV’s “First Mover” on Friday that if the New York Attorney General prevails, defining ether as a security could have huge ramifications for the crypto world. Whether it is deemed one is likely to depend on what approach state and federal regulators take in defining the digital asset, but she said she doesn’t see how ether could be considered a security.

“I'm still unpacking that filing by Attorney General James, to really understand how a security is defined under state law. Obviously, it very much mimics the Howey Test from the [U.S.] Supreme Court case, of course, but oftentimes at the state level,” Evans said.

Once there are "federal guidelines, rules, regulations and laws that may preempt state law, oftentimes you'll see things percolate up from the states and eventually make it before the [U.S. Supreme Court] to render the ultimate determination. And this is what we often see" in new and emerging asset classes and industries, she said.

Nonetheless, the U.S. should be cautious about alienating the crypto industry and forcing it out of the country because it would be operating without U.S. regulatory oversight to protect investors, she said.

“If we're pushing this type of ecosystem offshore it will be more and more difficult for lawmakers and regulators to actually reach the point of keeping this ecosystem vibrant in the United States with clear and defined rules,” Evans said.

Read more: New York Attorney General Sues Crypto Exchange KuCoin, Alleges Ether Is a Security

Plus pour vous

Fintech and Crypto Firms Seek Bank Charters Under Trump Administration: Reuters

Goldman sees only two Fed rate cuts in 2025, BOfA sees extended Fed pause. (JamesQube/Pixabay)

Financial technology and crypto firms are increasingly applying for state or national bank charters, despite the community’s historical resistance to centralized banking.

Ce qu'il:

  • Fintech and crypto firms are increasingly applying for bank charters, anticipating a more favorable regulatory landscape.
  • Becoming a bank allows firms to accept deposits and lower borrowing costs but brings stricter oversight.
  • Regulatory bodies have historically approved few new bank charters, though recent signals suggest a more streamlined process.